HOW DO THE CONDITIONS COMPARE?

Not quite two months ago, on March 16, 2021, Raleigh's City Council approved case Z-45-20, a rezoning of *commercial* property for apartments that will provide much-needed workforce housing.

Council Member Stewart negotiated limits ("conditions") in that case that are far more stringent than the conditions proposed for Z-53-20, Lead Mine Tower, a luxury apartment project.

Examples:

  • Density of 22 units per acre, instead of 50 units per acre.

  • 150-foot setback next to R-4, instead of 50-foot setback.

  • 85-foot tree conservation area next to neighborhoods.

  • Maximum height of 59 feet on a flat site, instead of 68 feet along Lead Mine Road, on a steeply sloped site, towering over two-story homes downhill below.

  • 100-year stormwater management, instead of 25-year.

  • 8-foot sidewalks, instead of 5-foot sidewalks.


What's more, the Z-45-20 site is at the intersection of five-lane and six-lane thoroughfares with a traffic light and crosswalks, vs. no traffic light and no crosswalks for Z-53-20 at Lead Mine Road and Philcrest Drive – a hilly, curvy, country lane outside the city limits that's less than 20 feet wide, with no markings, curbs, gutters, street lights, or sidewalks.


THE UPSHOT: If the Council approves Z-53-20, it will have required FAR LESS of developers from Detroit for a luxury housing complex than it required of those providing vital affordable housing for Raleigh's workers. Think about the precedent it would set.

 

EVERYDAY CITIZENS CALLING FOR THE CITY OF RALEIGH TO PLAN FOR EQUITABLE GROWTH.

Wysong_edited.jpg

CITY OF RALEIGH 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE

All rezoning cases are reviewed for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan which provides vision and guidance for growth and development in the City of Raleigh.

Wysong_roof_view_back_view_edited.png

BIG BUSINESS HAS PLANS

Their big plans are inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map and not in keeping with the character and integrity of the single family homes immediately adjacent.